Twitter Updates

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Friday, June 27, 2008

    Obama on gun rights

    It was interesting to see both candidates responses to the Supreme Court's ruling on the DC handgun ban. What was even more interesting was the Obama campaigns soft dismissal of the ruling, when in reality, Obama is much more liberal on the 2nd Amendment than he claims.

    This section of the AP article on yesterday's ruling is quite revealing:

    Obama has voted to leave gun-makers and dealers open to lawsuits. He also took largely liberal positions on gun laws while in the Illinois legislature, including backing a ban on all forms of semiautomatic weapons and tighter state restrictions generally on firearms.
    A ban of all semiautomatic weapons? That's probably close to 60 or 70 percent of all guns. That is hardly supportive of the 2nd Amendment.

    Sunday, June 08, 2008

    AIDS Pandemic is Over

    A quarter of a century after the outbreak of Aids, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has accepted that the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared.

    In the first official admission that the universal prevention strategy promoted by the major Aids organisations may have been misdirected, Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids said there will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.

    Interesting article. I wonder two things:

    1. What are all of the domestic AIDS programs going to redirect their funds to?
    2. Why did the gay community protest the fact that AIDS was most rampant in their lifestyle for so long?

    Friday, March 07, 2008

    Abortion is racist.

    This is an article written by my friend, and black pastor, Reverend Clenard Childress. It is a telling view of abortion from the African American community perspective.

    Margaret Sanger Would Have Loved Barack Obama
    Contact: Rev. Clenard H. Childress Jr., 866-242-4997, 201-704-9325 cell revchildress@verizon.net, www.Theurbanprophet.org
    OPINION, March 5 /Christian Newswire/ -- Rev. Clenard H. Childress Jr., founder of Black Genocide.Org, and president of Learn North East, submits the following and is available for comment:
    Revelations of eugenic ideology and the racist practices of Planned Parenthood are unfolding more and more.
    The public is just beginning to believe what people of conscience have known long ago. Planned Parenthood has diabolically perpetrated their murderous plot to surgically eliminate those they deem undesirable. In other words, kill the babies of unsuspecting minority women by aborting their children .Then, tell them this is a "good thing" for you and your people. No other ethnic group in the United States has been decimated more by abortion than the Afro-American community. The war being waged upon innocent captives in the womb is led by Planned Parenthood.
    The strategy?
    Convince the targeted community to accept their eugenic racist plan by selecting one from their ethnicity to promote it. One of Planned Parenthood's earliest known projects was in 1939. It was called the Negro Project. A project designed to control the birth of "human weeds" which was how Margaret Sanger referred to colored people. A project designed to introduce abortion, sterilization and different forms of birth control. This is what a co-eugenic wrote to Margaret Sanger to make sure the "Negro Project" was a success:
    Clarance Gamble the Heir of Proctor and Gamble wrote a memorandum in November 1939 entitled "Suggestions for the Negro Project," In the letter he suggested black leaders to be placed in positions where it would appear they were in charge."
    This is a letter to Clarance Gamble, from Margaret Sanger, which she wrote,
    "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
    For those of you that don't know Barack Obama became a "minister" of Planned Parenthood a long time ago. He's so good at carrying out their racist murderous agenda against Afro-Americans and society at large that they gave him a 100% score on his voting record. Planned Parenthood is following the strategy of their racist founder Margaret Sanger to the letter. Planed Parenthood is saying 'We have our poster boy' get him out in front as a lure for their women and men. Get them into our abortion clinics and dismember their children by the millions! You say absurd? No Way? Planned Parenthoods Valentine cards were sent out to hundreds of thousands of young people in the nation. Whose face is plainly seen waving to them with a big smile? Whose endorsement is given to this racist and calloused organization? Who is used to lure children and give credibility to its hideous plot? Barack Obama, that's who!
    On July17,2007, Barack Obama said this a few months ago before the Planned Parenthood Action Fund,
    "Thank You, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, ($) Thanks to all of you at Planned Parenthood for all the work that you are doing for women all across the country and for families all across the country-and for men who have enough sense to realize you are helping them, all across the country. I want to thank Cecile Richards (national president of Planned Parenthood) for her extraordinary leadership. I am happy to see so many good friends here today, including Steve Trombley and Pam Sutherland from my home state of Illinois. We had a number of battles down in Springfield from many years and it's wonderful to see that they are here today"
    The first friend mentioned is Cecile Richards who he commends for extraordinary leadership in killing babies who are disproportionately black.
    The second is Steve Trombley; he is the president of Planned Parenthood Chicago. You can imagine how many of our young women have been victimized and whose pre-born children were killed under his supervision. His third friend he mentions is Pam Sutherland. She is the State CEO of Planned Parenthood for Illinois. America needs to know how much these folks were and continue today to be into the head and actions of Senator Barack Obama. How much did he compromise his own values?
    I choose here to quote Dr. Martin Luther King from his last Sunday sermon before his death, "There comes a time when one must take the position that is neither safe nor politic nor popular, but he must do it because conscience tells him it is right. I believe today that there is a need for all people of goodwill to come with a massive act of conscience and say in the words of the old Negro spiritual, We ain't goin' study war no more." This is the challenge facing modern man.
    When the challenge came to Barack Obama to call on conscience, he refused. What most Americans would say no to, he chooses to say, YES. He refused to do what the Dream called for, to allow your conscience to tell you what is right and what would be wrong. You may ask why but always remember this observation. Abortion is a lot like slavery. If it was not lucrative it would not have been legal!
    Pam Sutherland ... of ... Illinois Planned Parenthood ... told ABC News, "We worked with him specifically on his strategy. The Republicans were in control of the Illinois Senate at the time. They loved to hold votes on 'partial birth' and 'born alive.' They put these bills out all the time ... because they wanted to pigeonhole Democrats. ..."
    Let me interpret. We, Planned Parenthood, told him what to say and how to say it so we could continue to kill infants. Babies just a few inches from birth and those completely out of the womb that we missed! Our "colored minister" was well prepared by Planned Parenthood. Partial Birth abortion, which I will not describe here but know that 80% of Americans don't want this barbaric act practiced here in this country, Barack voted to keep it legal. The Born alive victims act is a law to protect a child that was born alive after a botched abortion. A law that would require that the child would receive medical assistance. Barack Obama voted against it. Yes Barack Obama with an "engaging personality" is being used by the leading abortion provider in the United States to promote and execute infanticide of predominately minority babies.
    And what are most Afro-Americans saying, "Yes We Can, Yes We Can!" They are ignoring conscience. They are ignoring the Dream!
    I have a Dream that one day, my four little children will live in a world where that they won't be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
    Yes, I believe it would be wonderful to have a Black man as president but it's more important for there to be God's man as president. That his or her character would reflect my values, values that are reflected in the 10 Commandments and our Declaration of Independence.
    Most African-Americans are applauding him for the color of his skin. They have failed to look at closely the content of his character.
    Martin Luther King , while sitting in a Birmingham jail, without the internet, cell phone, library resources or communication from the outside, penned that famous prophetic letter to answer some local Pastors who questioned his use of public demonstrations. Martin, in a portion of his letter discussed the responsibility of the church to address social issues, he said, "the early church put an end to such evils as infanticide" Martin Luther King wrote from the passion of his spirit. The spirit that was fighting for justice and equality. Martin called infant killing evil. Barack Obama calls it a women's right. Martin Luther King made his observation from a jail cell having been put there for defending the civil rights of those whom had been denied. Barack Obama has made his from caucusing with those who profit from the destruction of babies in the womb. These are men and women whom ignore the silent screams of a lost generation. Can we trust Obama's judgments? I think not.
    Another quote form Dr. Martin Luther King that would be so appropriate here is "The Negro cannot win if he chooses to sacrifice the future of his children for immediate comfort and safety." It is now imperative that we all hear the words of this great prophet of God. It is obvious that we must reject the Barack Obamas that have placed us in great danger by their ideologies. A position Martin Luther King warns us we cannot expect to win!
    Yes, Margaret Sanger would love Barack Obama. Her protégés certainly do

    Tuesday, February 26, 2008

    Interview with Jonathan Krive

    CollegePlus! Newsletter Accleration interviewed me on the art of communication. Below is the text:

    According to researcher George Barna, only about half of Christians in America feel comfortable communicating what they believe. In fact, in his recent book Revolution, Barna notes that most believers don’t even base their decisions on the Scriptures but instead on what they take in from the media, family members, and peers. CollegePlus! graduate Jonathan Krive has made it part of his goal in life to change this disturbing phenomenon.

    Krive currently lives in the Washington, D.C. area with his wife Noel. In 2007, he received a Presidential appointment to the Bush administration as a political appointee to the Department of Labor. He recently left the administration to become the fundraising coordinator for a nonprofit organization that helps philanthropists achieve their charitable goals.

    Krive has been involved in persuasive communication for over a decade, beginning with speech competitions sponsored by the National Christian Forensics and Communication Association, or NCFCA for short. Krive won this nationwide competition for three consecutive years before pursuing his college studies and other outlets for communicating a biblical worldview in today’s postmodern culture.

    To read the rest of the article, click here.

    Wednesday, October 24, 2007

    Jena 6 Myths

    Michelle Malkin posted an editorial on her website today from the Christian Science Monitor that completely debunks the media's portrayal of the Jena 6 incident. And the myths that have pervaded the media are extreme and revealing. You can read the whole article here.

    "The media got most of the basics wrong. In fact, I have never before witnessed such a disgrace in professional journalism. I should know. I live in Jena. My wife has taught at Jena High School for many years. And most important, I am probably the only reporter who has covered these events from the very beginning.The real story of Jena and the Jena 6 is quite different from what the national media presented. It’s time to set the record straight.

    "Myth 1: The Whites-Only Tree. There has never been a “whites-only” tree at Jena High School.

    "Myth 2: Nooses a Signal to Black Students. An investigation by school officials, police, and an FBI agent revealed the true motivation behind the placing of two nooses in the tree the day after the assembly. According to the expulsion committee, the crudely constructed nooses were not aimed at black students.

    "Myth 3: Nooses Were a Hate Crime. Although many believe the three white students should have been prosecuted for a hate crime for hanging the nooses, the incident did not meet the legal criteria for a federal hate crime.

    "Myth 7: The Schoolyard Fight. The event on Dec. 4, 2006 was consistently labeled a “schoolyard fight.” But witnesses described something much more horrific. Several black students, including those now known as the Jena 6, barricaded an exit to the school’s gym as they lay in wait for Justin Barker to exit. (It remains unclear why Mr. Barker was specifically targeted.)

    "Myth 8: The Attack Is Linked to the Nooses. Nowhere in any of the evidence, including statements by witnesses and defendants, is there any reference to the noose incident that occurred three months prior. This was confirmed by the United States attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, Donald Washington, on numerous occasions."

    Monday, August 20, 2007

    North American Union Moving Forward

    This week, President Bush will be meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort in Canada. The topic of discussion will be the Security and Prosperity Partnership. While the White House continues to dismiss the North American Union as a "silly conspiracy," documents obtained in FOIA requests suggest otherwise.

    The Washington Times picked up this story on the front page today. I found one paragraph of this story specifically interesting.

    "The White House dismissed suspicions of a coming North American Union as a 'silly' conspiracy theory. 'Americans are going to remain Americans, Canadians are going to remain Canadians and Mexicans are going to remain Mexicans,' a senior Bush administration official said on the condition of anonymity."

    The irony? Even when the White House is trying to dismiss claims of the North American Union it has to use anonymous officials. Why didn't it come right out and say, this is not a plan to cede away American sovereignty? Because that would be denying the truth.

    Worldnetdaily.com reported that 21 members of Congress sent a letter to President Bush urging him to open up the backroom deals being made about the SPP.


    "The last paragraph of the letter called upon the president 'not to pledge or agree to any further movement in connection with the SPP at the upcoming North American summit.'

    "The letter concluded that, 'in the interest of transparency and accountability, we urge you to bring to the Congress whatever provisions have already been agreed upon and those now being pursued or contemplated as part of this initiative, for the purpose of obtaining authorization through the normal legislative process.'

    "Signatories to the letter included the following members of the House of Representatives:

    • Rep. Terry Everett, R-Alabama
    • Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-California
    • Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colorado
    • Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas
    • Rep. Nancy Boyda, D-Kansas
    • Rep. Walter Jones, R-North Carolina
    • Rep. David Davis, R-Tenn.
    • Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Georgia
    • Rep. John Boozman, R-Arkansas
    • Rep. John Duncan, R-Tenn.
    • Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Virginia
    • Rep. Tom Price, R-Georgia
    • Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Florida
    • Rep. Sue Myrick, R-North Carolina
    • Rep. Jo Bonner, R-Alabama
    • Rep. Gary Miller, R-Calif.
    • Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa
    • Rep. Greg Walden, R-Oregon
    • Rep. Michael Rogers, R-Alabama
    • Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Michigan
    • Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Alabama
    • Rep. Todd Akin, R-Missouri
    Thankfully members of Congress and the media are picking up on this plan to cede away American sovereignty.

    Thursday, August 16, 2007

    GOP just doesn't get it

    Yesterday, at the St. Petersburg Chamber of Commerce, Republican Party chairman Mel Martinez confirmed that, sometimes, the GOP just doesn't understand. Sen. Martinez scolded Republican presidential candidates Giuliani and Romney for taking a tough stance on illegal immigration and opposing the President's immigration reform. The St. Petersburg Times reported.

    "Presidential contests are about leadership. ... It's about leading on the tough issues," Martinez told the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce. "It was easy to say, 'This wasn't good enough, this isn't right, I don't agree with Martinez.' ... But at the end of the day what is your answer? How would you solve this?"

    Well the first step is to deport illegal immigrants, put the national guard back on the border, and toughen penalties against employers. And do not grant illegal aliens amnesty.

    Isn't it simple logic, that if you increase some thing's desirability that more people will want it? Well how about offering citizenship in the greatest country in the world to the people of a corrupt third-world country? That's a pretty big incentive. And it will only increase the number of immigrants who seek to cross the border illegally.

    Why doesn't the Republican Party get it? When tens of thousands of people called their senators to oppose the immigration bill, didn't that send a clear message? When GOP donations dropped off by almost 40 percent, didn't that send a clear message? The American people do not want amnesty, and they don't want illegal immigration. What ever happened to politicians representing the people?

    Well, thankfully, most of the Republican Senators did represent America, and voted down the bill. Yet, Sen. Martinez still finds reason to criticize.